This item grows out of a recent study noting that in the US today few people have friends on the other side of the ideological fence.
It’s easy to imagine how that happens—there are just too many subjects to avoid! That raises the question of why all those topics are taboo. There are many reasons, but we deal here with one specific problem: distinguishing real issues from pretexts.
The problem is that while there are plenty of real policy issues where debate should be possible, they tend to be mixed-in with taboo topics where the policy positions are actually donor’s self-interested pretexts (“climate change is a discredited hoax”). Public debates can be (and often are) staged to discuss issues in the taboo category, but they never get very far. There’s not much to be discussed when the stated policy is not the point.
It’s not necessarily easy to figure out what’s real, and undoubtedly many people will disagree with the examples here. However the idea is to focus on a few issue areas where we as a country ought to be able to make progress if we can keep track of what is real and what isn’t.
We put issues in two categories: non-issues and real issues. Non-issues are issues only if donors (or other political considerations) force them to be. We owe it to the country to get past them. Real issues are the significant questions we need to solve.
- Climate change
As just noted, climate change is a poster child for pretexts. There is of course one primary reason this whole subject is partisan, and his name is Charles Koch. In addition to the false hoax claim, there is a continually-morphing litany of other misrepresentations. It used to be easier to be a skeptic. By now more than enough is known, so that ordinary risk analysis says the time has come to get serious.
Climate change is real.
Burning of fossil fuels is causing it.
The people working on it are not political hacks, but dedicated scientists faced with a hard problem.
Risk assessment and what needs to happen now. Steps and timing.
Roles of government and the private sector, e.g. supporting the power companies.
How research, particularly energy research, can best support the private sector.
What infrastructure changes will be needed and when? Where will the jobs go?
Coordinating the whole effort.
It is worth pointing out that there are plenty of good, multi-year working-class jobs involved in dealing with climate change.
- Environmental policy and the EPA
What is frustrating about this topic is the extent to which the whole discussion of environmental regulation has gone on without specifics. Is it really possible to believe that all environmental regulation is bad? Even after the Flint disaster? It is not viable to have environmental regulation whipsawed back and forth between administrations.
Not all environmental regulation is bad.
Not all environmental regulation is bad for business.
Agreed-upon standards for regulation. Work from the current list of Trump administration actions and responses. Criteria to avoid overreach by all sides.
What is an appropriate process to assure that both the public interest and businesses have a say?
Should there be compensation for consequences of new rules?
Now that all the repeal and replace nightmares are out of our system, we really ought to be able to do something good about healthcare. This isn’t rocket science. Every other prosperous country has come up with something that works.
Obamacare works well enough to be a starting point. Sabotaging it helps no one.
The country needs a nationwide solution. Uniform treatment for all people is good.
Single-payer systems are used by most of the world and may have a role to play.
Availability of plans
Cost of plans
Assuring participation and coverage
Addressing needs of businesses
Getting religion out of the debate
Controlling costs of the program
Thus far the whole treatment of jobs has been based on campaign slogans. The current tax cut plan is a case in point. The millions of affected people deserve better.
Decline of good, low-skill working class jobs.
Decline in workforce participation.
Decline of upward mobility in the US.
No silver bullet.
What is and isn’t cured by growth.
Workable options for tariffs, subsidies, or other government actions on trade.
Long-standing issues with wage growth and inequality.
Role of education.
Role of government as an employer (e.g. infrastructure, climate projects).
Budget impact and tax plans.
Protecting the next generation.
It would be nice to believe that the country is now ready to get down to work. On real issues some level of bipartisan cooperation could even be the norm.